blob: 29e2fe8f857d3380113e6d65ea7b7e241f1649df [file] [log] [blame]
[section:powers Logs, Powers, Roots and Exponentials]
[section:log1p log1p]
``
#include <boost/math/special_functions/log1p.hpp>
``
namespace boost{ namespace math{
template <class T>
``__sf_result`` log1p(T x);
template <class T, class ``__Policy``>
``__sf_result`` log1p(T x, const ``__Policy``&);
}} // namespaces
Returns the natural logarithm of `x+1`.
The return type of this function is computed using the __arg_pomotion_rules:
the return is `double` when /x/ is an integer type and T otherwise.
[optional_policy]
There are many situations where it is desirable to compute `log(x+1)`.
However, for small `x` then `x+1` suffers from catastrophic cancellation errors
so that `x+1 == 1` and `log(x+1) == 0`, when in fact for very small x, the
best approximation to `log(x+1)` would be `x`. `log1p` calculates the best
approximation to `log(1+x)` using a Taylor series expansion for accuracy
(less than __te).
Alternatively note that there are faster methods available,
for example using the equivalence:
log(1+x) == (log(1+x) * x) / ((1-x) - 1)
However, experience has shown that these methods tend to fail quite spectacularly
once the compiler's optimizations are turned on, consequently they are
used only when known not to break with a particular compiler.
In contrast, the series expansion method seems to be reasonably
immune to optimizer-induced errors.
Finally when BOOST_HAS_LOG1P is defined then the `float/double/long double`
specializations of this template simply forward to the platform's
native (POSIX) implementation of this function.
The following graph illustrates the behaviour of log1p:
[graph log1p]
[h4 Accuracy]
For built in floating point types `log1p`
should have approximately 1 epsilon accuracy.
[h4 Testing]
A mixture of spot test sanity checks, and random high precision test values
calculated using NTL::RR at 1000-bit precision.
[endsect]
[section:expm1 expm1]
``
#include <boost/math/special_functions/expm1.hpp>
``
namespace boost{ namespace math{
template <class T>
``__sf_result`` expm1(T x);
template <class T, class ``__Policy``>
``__sf_result`` expm1(T x, const ``__Policy``&);
}} // namespaces
Returns e[super x] - 1.
The return type of this function is computed using the __arg_pomotion_rules:
the return is `double` when /x/ is an integer type and T otherwise.
[optional_policy]
For small x, then __ex is very close to 1, as a result calculating __exm1 results
in catastrophic cancellation errors when x is small. `expm1` calculates __exm1 using
rational approximations (for up to 128-bit long doubles), otherwise via
a series expansion when x is small (giving an accuracy of less than __te).
Finally when BOOST_HAS_EXPM1 is defined then the `float/double/long double`
specializations of this template simply forward to the platform's
native (POSIX) implementation of this function.
The following graph illustrates the behaviour of expm1:
[graph expm1]
[h4 Accuracy]
For built in floating point types `expm1`
should have approximately 1 epsilon accuracy.
[h4 Testing]
A mixture of spot test sanity checks, and random high precision test values
calculated using NTL::RR at 1000-bit precision.
[endsect]
[section:cbrt cbrt]
``
#include <boost/math/special_functions/cbrt.hpp>
``
namespace boost{ namespace math{
template <class T>
``__sf_result`` cbrt(T x);
template <class T, class ``__Policy``>
``__sf_result`` cbrt(T x, const ``__Policy``&);
}} // namespaces
Returns the cubed root of x: x[super 1/3].
The return type of this function is computed using the __arg_pomotion_rules:
the return is `double` when /x/ is an integer type and T otherwise.
[optional_policy]
Implemented using Halley iteration.
The following graph illustrates the behaviour of cbrt:
[graph cbrt]
[h4 Accuracy]
For built in floating-point types `cbrt`
should have approximately 2 epsilon accuracy.
[h4 Testing]
A mixture of spot test sanity checks, and random high precision test values
calculated using NTL::RR at 1000-bit precision.
[endsect]
[section:sqrt1pm1 sqrt1pm1]
``
#include <boost/math/special_functions/sqrt1pm1.hpp>
``
namespace boost{ namespace math{
template <class T>
``__sf_result`` sqrt1pm1(T x);
template <class T, class ``__Policy``>
``__sf_result`` sqrt1pm1(T x, const ``__Policy``&);
}} // namespaces
Returns `sqrt(1+x) - 1`.
The return type of this function is computed using the __arg_pomotion_rules:
the return is `double` when /x/ is an integer type and T otherwise.
[optional_policy]
This function is useful when you need the difference between sqrt(x) and 1, when
x is itself close to 1.
Implemented in terms of `log1p` and `expm1`.
The following graph illustrates the behaviour of sqrt1pm1:
[graph sqrt1pm1]
[h4 Accuracy]
For built in floating-point types `sqrt1pm1`
should have approximately 3 epsilon accuracy.
[h4 Testing]
A selection of random high precision test values
calculated using NTL::RR at 1000-bit precision.
[endsect]
[section:powm1 powm1]
``
#include <boost/math/special_functions/powm1.hpp>
``
namespace boost{ namespace math{
template <class T1, class T2>
``__sf_result`` powm1(T1 x, T2 y);
template <class T1, class T2, class ``__Policy``>
``__sf_result`` powm1(T1 x, T2 y, const ``__Policy``&);
}} // namespaces
Returns x[super y ] - 1.
The return type of this function is computed using the __arg_pomotion_rules
when T1 and T2 are dufferent types.
[optional_policy]
There are two domains where this is useful: when y is very small, or when
x is close to 1.
Implemented in terms of `expm1`.
The following graph illustrates the behaviour of powm1:
[graph powm1]
[h4 Accuracy]
Should have approximately 2-3 epsilon accuracy.
[h4 Testing]
A selection of random high precision test values
calculated using NTL::RR at 1000-bit precision.
[endsect]
[section:hypot hypot]
template <class T1, class T2>
``__sf_result`` hypot(T1 x, T2 y);
template <class T1, class T2, class ``__Policy``>
``__sf_result`` hypot(T1 x, T2 y, const ``__Policy``&);
__effects computes [equation hypot]
in such a way as to avoid undue underflow and overflow.
The return type of this function is computed using the __arg_pomotion_rules
when T1 and T2 are of different types.
[optional_policy]
When calculating [equation hypot] it's quite easy for the intermediate terms to either
overflow or underflow, even though the result is in fact perfectly representable.
[h4 Implementation]
The function is even and symmetric in x and y, so first take assume
['x,y > 0] and ['x > y] (we can permute the arguments if this is not the case).
Then if ['x * [epsilon][space] >= y] we can simply return /x/.
Otherwise the result is given by:
[equation hypot2]
[endsect]
[include pow.qbk]
[endsect][/section:powers Logs, Powers, Roots and Exponentials]
[/
Copyright 2006 John Maddock and Paul A. Bristow.
Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
(See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at
http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt).
]