blob: 1b3fd9f397124a716529efd640d11abb6a4d330b [file] [log] [blame]
[section:adaptors Range Adaptors]
[section:introduction Introduction and motivation]
A [*Range Adaptor] is a class that wraps an existing Range to provide a new Range with different behaviour. Since the behaviour of Ranges is determined by their associated iterators, a Range Adaptor simply wraps the underlying iterators with new special iterators. In this example
``
#include <boost/range/adaptors.hpp>
#include <boost/range/algorithm.hpp>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
std::vector<int> vec;
boost::copy( vec | boost::adaptors::reversed,
std::ostream_iterator<int>(std::cout) );
``
the iterators from `vec` are wrapped `reverse_iterator`s. The type of the underlying Range Adapter is not documented because you do not need to know it. All that is relevant is that the expression
``
vec | boost::adaptors::reversed
``
returns a Range Adaptor where the iterator type is now the iterator type of the range `vec` wrapped in `reverse_iterator`. The expression `boost::adaptors::reversed` is called an *Adaptor Generator*.
There are two ways of constructing a range adaptor. The first is by using `operator|()`. This is my preferred technique, however while discussing range adaptors with others it became clear that some users of the library strongly prefer a more familiar function syntax, so equivalent functions of the present tense form have been added as an alternative syntax. The equivalent to `rng | reversed` is `adaptors::reverse(rng)` for example.
Why do I prefer the `operator|` syntax? The answer is readability:
``
std::vector<int> vec;
boost::copy( boost::adaptors::reverse(vec),
std::ostream_iterator<int>(std::cout) );
``
This might not look so bad, but when we apply several adaptors, it becomes much worse. Just compare
``
std::vector<int> vec;
boost::copy( boost::adaptors::unique( boost::adaptors::reverse( vec ) ),
std::ostream_iterator<int>(std::cout) );
``
to
``
std::vector<int> vec;
boost::copy( vec | boost::adaptors::reversed
| boost::adaptors::uniqued,
std::ostream_iterator<int>(std::cout) );
``
Furthermore, some of the adaptor generators take arguments themselves and these arguments are expressed with function call notation too. In those situations, you will really appreciate the succinctness of `operator|()`.
[heading Composition of Adaptors]
Range Adaptors are a powerful complement to Range algorithms. The reason is that adaptors are ['*orthogonal*] to algorithms. For example, consider these Range algorithms:
* `boost::copy( rng, out )`
* `boost::count( rng, pred )`
What should we do if we only want to copy an element `a` if it satisfies some predicate, say `pred(a)`? And what if we only want to count the elements that satisfy the same predicate? The naive answer would be to use these algorithms:
* `boost::copy_if( rng, pred, out )`
* `boost::count_if( rng, pred )`
These algorithms are only defined to maintain a one to one relationship with the standard library algorithms. This approach of adding algorithm suffers a combinatorial explosion. Inevitably many algorithms are missing `_if` variants and there is redundant development overhead for each new algorithm. The Adaptor Generator is the design solution to this problem.
[heading Range Adaptor alternative to copy_if algorithm]
``
boost::copy_if( rng, pred, out );
``
can be expressed as
``
boost::copy( rng | boost::adaptors::filtered(pred), out );
``
[heading Range Adaptor alternative to count_if algorithm]
``
boost::count_if( rng, pred );
``
can be expressed as
``
boost::count( rng | boost::adaptors::filtered(pred), out );
``
What this means is that ['*no*] algorithm with the `_if` suffix is needed. Furthermore, it turns out that algorithms with the `_copy` suffix are not needed either. Consider the somewhat misdesigned `replace_copy_if()` which may be used as
``
std::vector<int> vec;
boost::replace_copy_if( rng, std::back_inserter(vec), pred );
``
With adaptors and algorithms we can express this as
``
std::vector<int> vec;
boost::push_back(vec, rng | boost::adaptors::replaced_if(pred, new_value));
``
The latter code has several benefits:
1. it is more ['*efficient*] because we avoid extra allocations as might happen with `std::back_inserter`
2. it is ['*flexible*] as we can subsequently apply even more adaptors, for example: ``
boost::push_back(vec, rng | boost::adaptors::replaced_if(pred, new_value)
| boost::adaptors::reversed);
``
3. it is ['*safer*] because there is no use of an unbounded output iterator.
In this manner, the ['*composition*] of Range Adaptors has the following consequences:
1. we no longer need `_if`, `_copy`, `_copy_if` and `_n` variants of algorithms.
2. we can generate a multitude of new algorithms on the fly, for example, above we generated `reverse_replace_copy_if()`
In other words:
[*Range Adaptors are to algorithms what algorithms are to containers]
[endsect]
[section:general_requirements General Requirements]
In the description of generator expressions, the following notation is used:
* `fwdRng` is an expression of a type `R` that models `ForwardRange`
* `biRng` is an expression of a type `R` that models `BidirectionalRange`
* `rndRng` is an expression of a type `R` that models `RandomAccessRange`
* `pred` is an expression of a type that models `UnaryPredicate`
* `bi_pred` is an expression of a type that models `BinaryPredicate`
* `fun` is an expression of a type that models `UnaryFunction`
* `value`, `new_value` and `old_value` are objects convertible to `boost::range_value<R>::type`
* `n,m` are integer expressions convertible to `range_difference<R>::type`
Also note that `boost::range_value<R>::type` must be implicitly convertible to the type arguments to `pred`, `bi_pred` and `fun`.
Range Category in the following adaptor descriptions refers to the minimum range concept required by the range passed to the adaptor. The resultant range is a model of the same range concept as the input range unless specified otherwise.
Returned Range Category is the concept of the returned range. In some cases the returned range is of a lesser category than the range passed to the adaptor. For example, the `filtered` adaptor returns only a `ForwardRange` regardless of the input.
Furthermore, the following rules apply to any expression of the form
``
rng | boost::adaptors::adaptor_generator
``
1. Applying `operator|()` to a range `R` (always left argument) and a range adapter `RA` (always right argument) yields a new range type which may not conform to the same range concept as `R`.
2. The return-type of `operator|()` is otherwise unspecified.
3. `operator|()` is found by Argument Dependent Lookup (ADL) because a range adaptor is implemented in namespace `boost::adaptors`.
4. `operator|()` is used to add new behaviour ['*lazily*] and never modifies its left argument.
5. All iterators extracted from the left argument are extracted using qualified calls to `boost::begin()` and `boost::end()`.
6. In addition to the `throw`-clauses below, `operator|()` may throw exceptions as a result of copying iterators. If such copying cannot throw an exception, then neither can the whole expression.
[endsect]
[section:reference Reference]
[include adaptors/adjacent_filtered.qbk]
[include adaptors/copied.qbk]
[include adaptors/filtered.qbk]
[include adaptors/indexed.qbk]
[include adaptors/indirected.qbk]
[include adaptors/map_keys.qbk]
[include adaptors/map_values.qbk]
[include adaptors/replaced.qbk]
[include adaptors/replaced_if.qbk]
[include adaptors/reversed.qbk]
[include adaptors/sliced.qbk]
[include adaptors/strided.qbk]
[include adaptors/tokenized.qbk]
[include adaptors/transformed.qbk]
[include adaptors/uniqued.qbk]
[endsect]
[endsect]