|  | CPU Scheduler implementation hints for architecture specific code | 
|  |  | 
|  | Nick Piggin, 2005 | 
|  |  | 
|  | Context switch | 
|  | ============== | 
|  | 1. Runqueue locking | 
|  | By default, the switch_to arch function is called with the runqueue | 
|  | locked. This is usually not a problem unless switch_to may need to | 
|  | take the runqueue lock. This is usually due to a wake up operation in | 
|  | the context switch. See arch/ia64/include/asm/switch_to.h for an example. | 
|  |  | 
|  | To request the scheduler call switch_to with the runqueue unlocked, | 
|  | you must `#define __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW` in a header file | 
|  | (typically the one where switch_to is defined). | 
|  |  | 
|  | Unlocked context switches introduce only a very minor performance | 
|  | penalty to the core scheduler implementation in the CONFIG_SMP case. | 
|  |  | 
|  | CPU idle | 
|  | ======== | 
|  | Your cpu_idle routines need to obey the following rules: | 
|  |  | 
|  | 1. Preempt should now disabled over idle routines. Should only | 
|  | be enabled to call schedule() then disabled again. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 2. need_resched/TIF_NEED_RESCHED is only ever set, and will never | 
|  | be cleared until the running task has called schedule(). Idle | 
|  | threads need only ever query need_resched, and may never set or | 
|  | clear it. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 3. When cpu_idle finds (need_resched() == 'true'), it should call | 
|  | schedule(). It should not call schedule() otherwise. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 4. The only time interrupts need to be disabled when checking | 
|  | need_resched is if we are about to sleep the processor until | 
|  | the next interrupt (this doesn't provide any protection of | 
|  | need_resched, it prevents losing an interrupt). | 
|  |  | 
|  | 4a. Common problem with this type of sleep appears to be: | 
|  | local_irq_disable(); | 
|  | if (!need_resched()) { | 
|  | local_irq_enable(); | 
|  | *** resched interrupt arrives here *** | 
|  | __asm__("sleep until next interrupt"); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | 5. TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG can be set by idle routines that do not | 
|  | need an interrupt to wake them up when need_resched goes high. | 
|  | In other words, they must be periodically polling need_resched, | 
|  | although it may be reasonable to do some background work or enter | 
|  | a low CPU priority. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 5a. If TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is set, and we do decide to enter | 
|  | an interrupt sleep, it needs to be cleared then a memory | 
|  | barrier issued (followed by a test of need_resched with | 
|  | interrupts disabled, as explained in 3). | 
|  |  | 
|  | arch/x86/kernel/process.c has examples of both polling and | 
|  | sleeping idle functions. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | Possible arch/ problems | 
|  | ======================= | 
|  |  | 
|  | Possible arch problems I found (and either tried to fix or didn't): | 
|  |  | 
|  | ia64 - is safe_halt call racy vs interrupts? (does it sleep?) (See #4a) | 
|  |  | 
|  | sh64 - Is sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a) | 
|  |  | 
|  | sparc - IRQs on at this point(?), change local_irq_save to _disable. | 
|  | - TODO: needs secondary CPUs to disable preempt (See #1) | 
|  |  |